Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Roscoe trustees debate code‑enforcement contract, vehicle use and enforcement remedies
Summary
Trustees reviewed a $45,000 annual code‑enforcement line item, discussed a roughly $4,000 monthly run rate and questioned whether contractors use village vehicles or their own cars with magnetic stickers; legal remedies and complaint channels were explained by staff.
Trustees spent substantial time discussing the village’s code‑enforcement contract, vehicle usage and enforcement remedies.
Chair reminded the board that the packet shows an appropriation of $45,000 for code enforcement this calendar year and that the board approved an expenditure that evening of roughly $4,000, which the chair described as the monthly run rate. He said members with specific questions should contact the village administrator or raise them at the next meeting.
Trustees raised concerns about whether contract officers drive village vehicles or use their own cars with magnetic identification. One trustee asked if officers coming from Wisconsin drive village vehicles; the village administrator and Chair said the contract expects contractors to use their own vehicles with magnetic stickers and the village vehicle previously used for code enforcement has been reassigned to the police fleet. “The vehicle is now part of the police department fleet,” the Chair stated.
On enforcement approach, the village administrator described the typical process: the village issues a notice, and if the property owner does not comply the village can have the property mowed and place a lien for the cost. For more serious or persistent violations the village may seek a court order to compel remediation. The administrator said residents with complaints should submit them through the village’s code‑enforcement channel; the transcript includes multiple, inconsistent transcriptions of the email/web address offered, so residents should use the village’s official website or the phone number the administrator gave: (815) 846‑7098.
Trustees discussed options for bringing the work in‑house, noting that an in‑house position historically included a village vehicle and that any future job description, pay and benefits would need to be crafted by the board. The chair stressed the goal of code enforcement is compliance and noted most residents respond after notification; the village will pursue legal steps only when necessary.
The board did not take formal action to change the contract during this meeting.
