Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Mining And Quarrying topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
160‑acre mining, processing and asphalt proposal draws heated public reaction; commission pauses and staff requests continuation
Summary
Developer Jack Keasch presented a proposal to annex and convert 160 acres for mining, large crushing and an asphalt/ready‑mix operation north of Woodstock. Keasch offered phased reclamation and a 107‑acre donation including an 85‑acre lake; residents raised concerns about dust, trucks and groundwater. Staff requested the item be continued for additional documents and review.
Developer Jack Keasch presented a multi‑part proposal Jan. 15 to annex and rezone 160 acres north of Woodstock for extraction, asphalt and related operations, and outlined a phased plan he said would include reclamation and public amenities.
Keasch described the site’s history and operations, offered to donate up to 107 acres — including an 85‑acre lake and public beach — after reclamation, and stressed local benefits such as aggregate availability for area construction and potential sales‑tax and royalty revenue. He said his company has operated similar sites, offered site tours and invited public inspection of operations. “If you come to join 09:11 on Saturday, you could document yourself that he’s doing something wrong, or honestly admit, I can’t hear or see anything,” Keasch said in response to public concerns about noise and dust.
Members of the public raised concerns about silica and dust, groundwater contamination and truck traffic; Keasch disputed some claims and pointed to monitoring and regulatory oversight, and he said MSHA and other agencies conduct testing at such sites. The hearing grew heated; the chair called a short recess for decorum after interruptions. Staff told the commission it was still receiving submitted documents and asked that the item be continued to allow time for a complete record and for engineering/tree‑survey materials to be provided.
No final action or vote was taken on the mining/annexation requests at the Jan. 15 meeting; staff explicitly requested a continuation so outstanding engineering comments and a tree survey could be completed. The commission allowed Keasch to finish his presentation and said the matter would return when staff and the applicant provide the additional materials needed for a formal recommendation.
The proposal’s key claims — including the scale of reclamation, the expected royalties and the absence of groundwater impacts — were made by the petitioner and remain subject to verification by city staff and technical reviewers; several nearby residents requested further independent data and monitoring commitments before the commission or council moves to a decision.
