Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Grant Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Grant-aid committee recommends $358,500 in awards; commissioners press oversight and conflict rules

City Commission of the City of Winter Haven · May 21, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Grant Aid Review Committee recommended $358,500 in awards across local nonprofits, keeping most legacy recipients level but increasing Meals on Wheels; commissioners raised questions about spending stipulations, oversight, conflicts of interest and a new state attestation tied to SB 1134.

City staff reported on May 26 that the Grant Aid Review Committee reviewed 58 applications and recommended $358,500 in awards for the current cycle, leaving $24,037 unallocated from the original budget.

Katrina Hill, director of public affairs and communications, told the commission the committee preserved legacy funding for most long-standing applicants while declining funding for several returning and new applicants that did not meet prioritization criteria. "They looked at them very closely and tried to fund those that met the guidance that you had offered in the focus areas," Hill said.

The committee prioritized applicants that serve children, the elderly, people experiencing homelessness, and those demonstrating measurable impact and fiscal responsibility. The committee recommended a modest increase for Meals on Wheels to address higher food costs, Hill said.

Commissioner Davis pressed staff on whether the city can place stipulations on how funds are spent (for example, prohibiting gift-card purchases) and how the city enforces spending restrictions. Assistant city attorney Drew Crawford said the commission may impose stipulations, but doing so increases oversight and enforcement work. "Any kind of stipulations are going to add more work onto oversight," Crawford said.

Commissioners also discussed conflicts of interest and disclosure procedures. Staff described the committee's conflict process (abstentions and Forms AB) and recommended the commission follow similar disclosure practices during Tuesday's votes so that members do not vote on organizations where they have affiliations.

Staff flagged state legislative changes (Senate Bill 1134) that affect local funding related to programs or policies tied to diversity, equity and inclusion. The city attorney’s office has prepared an attestation required before distribution of funds this year; staff said the attestation will be required prior to disbursing awards to ensure compliance with the new state law.

Next steps: the committee's recommendations will be on the commission's Tuesday agenda for formal action; commissioners may disclose conflicts and request separate votes for contested items.