Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge Assembly not to strip community comprehensive plans from CUP process
Summary
Public comment at the May 19 meeting focused heavily on Ordinance 26-021, which would remove community comprehensive plans from consideration during conditional use permits; residents and former planning commissioners said comprehensive plans are an essential local tool and urged the Assembly to preserve them.
Several residents urged the Assembly on May 19 to oppose Ordinance 26-021, a proposal that would remove consideration of community comprehensive plans during conditional use permit (CUP) review. Patricia Fisher, who said she helped draft the Meadow Lakes comprehensive plan and led resistance to a 2021 gravel pit CUP, called the ordinance a “shotgun approach” that would gut community protections by stripping comprehensive plans from decision-making.
Other speakers, including former planning commissioners and community-council members, echoed that comprehensive plans are a key tool developed over years by residents and that taking them out of the CUP process would effectively remove community input. Assemblymembers discussed scheduling for the ordinance’s public hearing and whether community councils should be given additional time to weigh in; after votes and amendments the public hearing date was ultimately set for June 2 so the public can testify then.
Supporters of the ordinance framed it as a change to streamline certain CUP decisions; opponents argued it would remove a principal means for neighborhoods to protect local character. The Assembly did not decide the ordinance’s merits at this meeting; the item was scheduled for public hearing.
