Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the 287g Immigration Agreement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Divided public comments at Mesa study session over 287(g) immigration agreement
Summary
Speakers at the May 18 Mesa City Council study session offered sharply contrasting views on the city's 287(g) agreement: one speaker accused ICE of abuses and urged the council to reconsider the partnership, while another resident praised the agreement as contributing to Mesa's public-safety record.
Get email alerts on the 287g Immigration Agreement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Two public speakers at the Mesa City Council study session on May 18 offered sharply contrasting views on the city's 287(g) immigration-enforcement agreement.
At the podium, a resident identified by the presiding officer as Mr. Hefkart said he opposed the 287(g) agreement and leveled serious accusations about Immigration and Customs Enforcement, saying agents are "racially profiling and using excessive force frequently" and describing detention conditions in strongly critical terms. He urged the council to place the agreement on the agenda for council action and warned council members that the community "will be watching the way you vote." He also accused the council of changing meeting policies to silence speakers and said complaints had been reported to the Arizona attorney general.
Bob Hathcock, a District 2 resident who spoke next, said he supports Mesa's partnership with federal immigration enforcement. Hathcock highlighted remarks from Police Chief Dan Butler reporting a 14% drop in violent crime and a high case-clearance rate, and credited the 287(g) relationship as a contributing factor to Mesa's public-safety standing. Hathcock said he opposed Mesa becoming what he described as a "sanctuary city" and thanked the council for maintaining the agreement.
The mayor and council did not act on the 287(g) agreement at the study session; the remarks occurred during the "items from citizens present" public-comment portion of the meeting. The transcript records both accusations by the first speaker and supportive testimony by Hathcock but does not show any council direction or formal staff response during this session.

