Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Pool Code Amendment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission backs pool-and-spa code amendment to keep higher local safety standards

Watertown Planning Commission · May 22, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Planning Commission unanimously recommended an ordinance amendment (item 2026-17) aligning parts of local rules with the International Swimming Pool and Spa Code while retaining a higher local requirement: permanent pools without ASTM-compliant covers must have a 6-foot fence; a compliant cover allows a 4-foot barrier. Staff will require manufacturer specs and locked-fence language.

The Watertown Planning Commission voted to forward a proposed ordinance amendment (item 2026-17) that would align local pool rules with the 2024 International Building Code and the International Swimming Pool and Spa Code (ISPC), while keeping a higher local safety standard in place to protect children.

Planning staff explained the proposed approach: permanent pools that require permits currently must have a 6-foot fence; under the ISPC, a 4-foot barrier is allowed and an ASTM-compliant pool cover can eliminate the barrier requirement. Staff proposed letting a compliant pool cover reduce the barrier to 4 feet but otherwise keeping a 6-foot fence requirement and adding language requiring locked fences and submission of manufacturer specifications to prove a cover meets the ASTM standard.

"If you have a pool cover that meets the ASTM standards, you do not need a barrier at all," Brandy Hannon said while explaining the ISPC approach. Commissioners asked how the city would verify compliance and whether power mechanisms for covers would be secured; staff said applicants must submit manufacturer specs and installation details, and staff would review whether mechanisms were appropriately secured.

Commissioner Olby asked how a "permanent" pool is defined; staff said a permanent pool is one that remains in place more than six months of the year. Commissioners expressed general support for the clarification and emphasized child-safety goals. A motion recommending the ordinance amendment passed unanimously, and the commission will forward the recommendation to City Council.

Next steps: staff will include manufacturer-specification requirements in permit submittals and propose locked-fence language; the City Council will review the commission's recommendation.