Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the S.202 Appliance Standards topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House energy panel agrees in straw poll to send S.202 to conference as members split on electric-motor standards
Summary
The House Energy & Digital Infrastructure committee decided in a straw poll to send S.202 to a committee of conference rather than amend it on the floor, after members raised timing concerns, disputed additions to electric-motor standards and debated changes to landlord permission language.
Get email alerts on the S.202 Appliance Standards topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rep. Kathleen James, chair of the House Energy & Digital Infrastructure committee, told members on May 19 that S.202 faces tight calendar pressure and is unlikely to survive if sent back to the Senate for amendment. The chair recommended seeking a committee of conference so the House and Senate could negotiate outstanding issues without killing the bill on timing grounds.
A core dispute among members involved whether to add electric motors to the bill’s appliance-efficiency standards. One committee speaker proposed a "trigger" that would make motor standards effective only if California finalizes similar rules, arguing California’s market scale would drive manufacturer behavior. Other members said the committee lacks direct testimony from manufacturers about downstream cost and implementation impacts and cautioned against adopting complex equipment standards without more information. "We didn't actually hear testimony from manufacturers, how this is gonna affect everything downstream in the future," said Richard Bailey (first appearing as Speaker 1), who said he could not support the bill as amended with motors included.
Members also debated revised landlord-permission language added in the Senate version. The Senate language would require landlords to respond within 10 days with any reasonable restrictions and would allow a tenant to proceed if the landlord does not respond; some House members said that flips prior House language that had given landlords an explicit veto. Chair James said she would not be comfortable risking a 5–4 concurrence on the floor and recommended sending the bill to conference as the pragmatic way to keep it alive for further negotiation.
The committee took a straw poll and the chair announced the panel would request House appointments to a conference committee and message that action to the floor. The transcript records members indicating support and the chair saying, "So we will take it to conference." The exact floor tallies mentioned at times in discussion were unclear in the transcript.
What happens next: Chair James said she will ask the Speaker to appoint three House members to the conference committee when S.202 reaches the floor; if a conference committee is appointed, the House position will be the bill the House originally passed and the conference would attempt to reconcile differences with the Senate version, including whether to keep or drop the electric-motors language.
The committee did not take a formal recorded roll-call vote; the action recorded in the transcript was a straw poll and a decision to seek a conference committee.

