Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Investments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Advisers urge Glencoe to broaden investment policy to boost yields; committee asks for guardrails
Summary
External advisers PTMA recommended that the village update its investment policy to allow longer corporate maturities and certain asset-backed securities (available to home-rule municipalities) to increase yield; committee members supported exploring the change but asked staff to draft policy limits and protections first.
Get email alerts on the Public Investments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Investment advisers from PTMA on Thursday outlined the village’s short-term and separately managed portfolios, reported modest outperformance versus a treasury benchmark, and recommended that the village update its investment policy to allow broader corporate allocations and asset-backed securities.
Patrick Trevlin of CTMA introduced the presentation and provided arbitrage estimates for several outstanding bond issues. A PTMA presenter said the portfolio is a laddered 1-to-5-year strategy that recently shifted modestly from treasuries into higher-quality corporate securities, producing an approximate 14-basis-point yield advantage over the treasury benchmark and about a 50-basis-point excess return versus that benchmark over the past year.
The advisers recommended two specific policy updates: (1) explicitly permit 10-year, single-A-or-better corporate securities under state statute for added yield in the 3–5-year segments, and (2) for home-rule municipalities, consider authorizing limited exposure to lower-rated (BBB) corporates and asset-backed securities (prime auto, credit-card tranches) as a way to enhance income. Advisers emphasized credit research and diversification, noting they screen underlying collateral and avoid subprime structures.
Committee members expressed cautious interest; questions focused on guardrails such as concentration limits, benchmarks, reporting requirements and scenarios that would trigger policy review. One member urged that any change include explicit limits and that staff return with a redlined policy for approval.
What’s next: staff said it will draft policy language with suggested limits and protections and bring the revision back to the committee for formal consideration and potential approval.

