Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Social Media topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Policy committee debates social-media rules and crowdfunding procedures; considers consolidating older policies
Summary
Committee members discussed updating the district's social-media policy to avoid unintentionally restricting staff-promoted school activities, and asked staff to draft clearer crowdfunding approval procedures after reports that some student fundraisers were blocked.
Get email alerts on the Social Media topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The committee reviewed an older social-media policy and debated how to balance protection against inappropriate staff'student interactions with the district's interest in promoting school events.
"This as written seems to prohibit the activities we like where they're highlighting great stuff that's happening in the schools," one committee member said, urging clearer distinction between personal accounts and school-sanctioned accounts. Members proposed using "social media" rather than "social networking site" in policy language and discussed defining what counts as a school-sponsored account versus a private or club-run account.
Staff and members suggested folding useful components of the outdated policy into related employee-internet and student-relations policies (for example, Internet-access for staff and employee'student-relationship policies) rather than leaving the long, dated policy intact. One staff member noted some sample policies in the packet had not been updated since 2009 or 2010 and recommended consolidation at a future meeting.
Members also raised crowdfunding and fundraising procedures. A committee member reported that some student groups, including a senior class, were blocked from running fundraisers and asked for a clear approval process and accounting controls that would allow student fundraisers while preventing misuse of school logos or premature release of district documents. Staff agreed to pull together procedures and to circulate relevant examples before the next meeting.
The committee did not adopt final changes; instead members recommended staff return with proposed edits and suggested the working group consult principals and student representatives when drafting consolidated language.

