Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Procurement Law Enforcement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission approves $18,930 purchase of KeyTrak key and evidence-tracking system

Dickinson County Commission · May 22, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Dickinson County Commission voted to authorize the sheriff’s office to buy a KeyTrak GuardianEdge key-tracking system for $18,930.21, to be paid from law-enforcement-specific funds; commissioners said the system should improve key control and evidence handling but discussed recurring maintenance costs.

The Dickinson County Commission voted to authorize the sheriff’s office to purchase a KeyTrak GuardianEdge key- and evidence-tracking system for $18,930.21, the commission said. The purchase will be funded from sheriff’s office-restricted accounts (VIN inspection and offender-registration fees), the commission was told.

The most immediate rationale came from the sheriff’s office representative, who said the system combines thumbprint-based key checkouts with a biometric temporary-evidence locker, allowing staff to “know who checked [a key] out, who checked it in” and to better track evidence left during an interrupted processing event. The presenter said the system addresses recurring lost-key problems for cruisers and evidence lockers.

Commissioners asked about recurring costs and warranty coverage; presenters cited a maintenance/licensing fee but gave different figures during discussion. Commissioners clarified that the $18,930.21 is the one-time authorization amount and that future maintenance fees will be charged to the sheriff’s departmental fund. The motion to approve the purchase was made by a commissioner who emphasized that the expense comes from law-enforcement-restricted funds and was seconded by another commissioner; the commission then voted to approve the authorization.

The commission directed staff to inform the sheriff’s office and to proceed with procurement consistent with county purchasing rules. No additional county-general-fund dollars were allocated for the purchase.

What happens next: The sheriff’s office will complete procurement and begin setup; the county will record ongoing maintenance fees against the appropriate sheriff’s fund in future budgets.