Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Bryce Canyon City weighs grants, loans and a sales-tax bond to fund recreation project

Bryce Canyon City Town Council · May 21, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City officials and staff reviewed grant windows and financing options for a proposed recreation/conservation project, including the Land and Water Conservation Fund (50% match), Utah Outdoor Recreation grants, a potential sales-tax revenue bond (up to $2.5 million) and loan options; preliminary project figures were discussed and staff said they would include amounts in the coming budget.

Bryce Canyon City officials discussed financing options for a proposed recreation and conservation project, focusing on federal and state grants, a sales-tax revenue bond and potential loan financing.

Staff member (S3) outlined the principal grant avenues the city is considering, saying the Land and Water Conservation Fund application window opens in December–January and “it’s a 50% match required.” S3 also noted that Utah Outdoor Recreation Grants have application windows in January and March and “can be used to match the Land and Water Conservation Fund.”

S3 described loan and bond options as complements to grant funding. “This would be a 100% loan at 0.5 to 2 and a half percent interest rate,” S3 said of one program loan alternative. The group also discussed using a sales-tax revenue bond, with S3 noting the bond could use sales tax as the revenue source and that the program’s maximum was “2,500,000.” Participants contrasted that with a conventional bank loan, which they reported as having been quoted at about 6%.

Committee member (S1) said the council would build preliminary land acquisition and capital-project figures into the budget. Staff gave a rough project estimate—S3 said “probably 703,000”—and S1 said they would tentatively budget about $130,000 for land and a larger figure for the project as placeholders while pursuing grants.

Why it matters: The funding path the council chooses affects whether the project can move forward without taking on high-rate debt or whether the city must budget larger local matches. Using state or federal grants could reduce local borrowing but requires timing applications and meeting match requirements.

Next steps: Council members asked staff to include the land purchase and project placeholders in the upcoming budget so the city is ready if grants are awarded; the group set the budget hearing for June 10 to consider those numbers.