Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves Cardinal Ridge townhome material revisions after developer presentation
Summary
Councilors approved final revisions to exterior materials and design for the Cardinal Ridge townhome plan after developer representatives displayed physical samples and answered questions about fixed color schemes, decking and upgrade options; council also approved related set‑aside and budget items elsewhere on the agenda.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A representative for Motera/Meadow‑area development (Timothy Krian) presented exterior material samples and revisions for the Cardinal Ridge townhome plan and the borough council voted to grant final approval for the materials and design at the May meeting.
Krian circulated shutter, decking, stone and Hardie siding samples and said exterior colors would be fixed except for optional interior and deck upgrades buyers could elect. "These are shutter samples... additionally, we have a decking sample here," he told councilors and provided explanations of how grade and door elevations affect whether an individual unit will have a deck or a patio.
Council members pressed on downgrade/upgrade rules and price points. The developer said base packages cannot be downgraded and estimated average price points in the mid‑$500,000s with variation by unit location and finish, adding some units could be closer to $500,000 while others approach $650,000 depending on options.
Following the presentation, Council moved final approval of the revisions to the building materials and design for the Cardinal Ridge townhome plan; the motion was seconded and carried by voice vote.
Separately on the agenda, the council approved an amended set‑aside agreement for residential land development, reducing the originally stated $259,472 by $59,700 to an amended $199,772 in accordance with a civil‑engineer letter dated 05/12/2026. One council member recused themself from that vote, citing a spousal representation conflict; the record notes one abstention and the motion carried.
The approvals complete the council's immediate review of the developer's material package; councilors encouraged continued communication with residents and noted the materials had been circulated to council in advance.

