Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget Fiscal Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Finance director: Cottonwood Heights’ fund balance steady in dollars but down as a share of revenue; property-tax impact packet published
Summary
Finance staff told the council the city’s dollars-on-hand are close to 2018–19 levels (roughly $4.0M) but the fund balance as a share of revenues has decreased from about 19% to an estimated 14%; staff also pointed council and the public to a property-tax impact packet tied to a proposed $3.5M increase.
Scott Juris, the city’s finance/budget officer, briefed the council on fund-balance trends and the property-tax impact schedule during Tuesday’s work session.
Juris said that although the city’s dollars-on-hand are similar to the 2018–19 level (about $4 million), the metric that matters for many reserves—fund balance as a percentage of budgeted revenues—has fallen from roughly 19% in 2018–19 to an estimated 14% in the current projection. "When you look at it from a percentage standpoint, we're in worse financial shape now than we were in 2018–19," Juris said, noting volatility created by one-time federal funds and sales-tax growth in prior years.
Juris described the composition of reserves (nonspendable, committed, assigned and unassigned), the city’s compensated-absence reserve and the practical timing constraints of property-tax receipts (much arrives in November–January) and sales-tax with a month-and-20-day lag. He recommended a comfortable fund-balance target range of roughly 15–25% and noted the tentative budget contains a slight projected fund-balance increase of about $220,000 for the coming fiscal year.
On planned outreach materials, Juris said the city has published a property-tax impact packet and supporting budget documents on the city website and reiterated staff is available to explain scenarios and department-level breakdowns. The packet outlines scenarios that would produce a $3.5 million increase in property-tax revenue and how those funds would be allocated across departments and capital needs.
Council members asked for clarifications on how multi-year budgeting, pre-funding capital-match obligations, and transfers between funds would be presented in a summary for the public and for the council’s standing budget committee. Juris said staff will circulate a simplified "one-pager" summary and that any transfers would return to council for approval.
What happens next: Staff will circulate a condensed budget-policy summary to council, post the full materials online, and continue work on budget documents that will appear in the upcoming business packet.
