Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget Votes topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Budget proposal fails in narrow vote; bus purchase and board results announced

BERLIN CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Board of Education · May 21, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Berlin Central School District clerk announced Proposition 1 (the 2026–27 budget) failed by 213‑210 and reported Proposition 2 (two buses) with 233 yes and 189 no while also saying it did not pass; the board announced one elected candidate and many write‑ins. The district faces a June 16 revote and possible contingency budgeting.

The clerk announced the district's Proposition 1 for the 2026–27 budget failed: "The budget proposition failed with 210 yes votes and 213 no votes," the clerk said. The clerk also read Proposition 2 — a purchase of two school buses at a cost reported in the tally — giving vote totals as "233 yes votes, 189 no votes," and then stated the bus proposition did not pass; the transcript contains inconsistent phrasing about whether that question passed.

Why it matters: Speaker 2 warned the board and community the immediate consequence of another failed vote would be a mandatory fallback, or contingency, budget. "If the budget fails again on June 16, it'll be clear that the district will be required to go to a contingency budget," Speaker 2 said, adding that a contingency budget would freeze spending at last year's levels and could force cuts to programming, athletics, pre‑K, academic intervention and other services.

What the results show: The clerk read the vote totals but also recited outcomes in ways that conflict in the transcript; the district has announced a June 16 revote for the budget. On the trustees' election, the clerk reported Frank Zwack received 230 votes and that a write‑in candidate (Mitchell, surname recorded in the results) received 64 votes; the clerk read a long list of additional write‑in names captured on the tally sheet.

District next steps: Administrators told the board they will seek community feedback and work on a revised proposal ahead of the June 16 revote. The clerk's summary of the two propositions and the election results was read at the meeting opening; officials said they will publicly post full vote tallies and further details following certification.

Provenance: The announcement of Proposition 1, Proposition 2 and the board election was read aloud by the clerk at the start of the meeting (timeline entries SEG 008–SEG 023 and SEG 024–SEG 052).