Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Amendment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Clayton County adopts zoning changes to limit concentrations of personal‑service businesses
Summary
The Clayton County Board of Commissioners on May 19 approved a zoning text amendment (Ordinance 2026-116) that adds definitions and development standards and gives staff distance-based tools to limit concentrations of barbershops, nail salons, vape shops and similar uses along corridors.
Get email alerts on the Zoning Amendment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Clayton County Board of Commissioners voted May 19 to adopt a zoning-text amendment designed to reduce concentrations of certain personal‑service and retail uses along county corridors.
Planning staff told commissioners the amendment, filed as BOC2604‑0614 and codified as Ordinance 2026‑116, adds definitions and development standards for selected uses — including barbershops, nail and beauty salons, vape shops and limited laundromats — and implements minimum distance requirements intended to preserve commercial diversity in targeted corridors. Staff and several speakers cited county licensing counts showing numerous personal‑service establishments in parts of the county and said the change is intended to attract a wider mix of business types.
"Everything in blue is new, everything in red is being stricken," a planning consultant said when presenting the proposed text changes and associated maps. Residents and community members who spoke in favor pointed to the county's median income and market mix, urging stronger zoning and enforcement to shift development patterns.
Commissioners discussed the scope of the amendment and whether other uses (for example, standalone car washes) should be added later. Staff said the ordinance cleans up definitions, adds distance rules and will be sent to the county's online code vendor once signed. On a voice vote the board approved the ordinance; the motion carried.
The ordinance authorizes staff to review applications using the updated definitions and standards; the county also discussed follow-up outreach, including one‑on‑one zoning guidance for the public to explain the new rules. The amendment does not retroactively close existing businesses but will be applied to future conditional‑use and permitting decisions.
The board did not provide a numerical roll-call tally in the record; the vote was taken by voice at the meeting. The ordinance will be codified and made available through county code services.

