Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Permit Application topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Environmental Impact Commission moves to administratively approve regulated activity at 126317 Cedar Drive amid member concern over drainage certification
Summary
The Commission moved to administratively approve regulated activity for 126317 Cedar Drive with six conditions; one member later said they opposed the approval because the application relied on an architect's drainage certification rather than a licensed drainage professional.
The Environmental Impact Commission moved to administratively approve a regulated activity at 126317 Cedar Drive, specifying six conditions of approval, during its March 25 meeting.
Commissioner John Schwartz moved the administrative approval; the motion was seconded and the chair called for the vote. The transcript records the chair calling for assent and a voice saying, “Aye.” The meeting record does not provide a full roll-call tally in the transcript for that vote.
Why it matters: the application was approved for administrative review with conditions that the commission said were already listed; however, at least one commissioner objected to the basis for that sign-off. Commissioner Christina Bren said the approval relied solely on the architect’s certification about drainage and argued that drainage is outside the architect’s licensing scope. “But an architect does not do drainage under licensing laws. And all we have is the architect's certification that the drainage will not be impacted. So I'm just voting against it for that reason,” Bren said.
The exchange raises a procedural concern about what kinds of professional certifications the commission will accept when reviewing regulated activities that could affect stormwater or site drainage. The transcript does not specify whether the commission will require further documentation from a licensed drainage engineer or alter the conditions for this permit.
What happened next: the chair continued with the agenda after the exchange. The transcript records subsequent motions to schedule a public hearing on regulation changes and to adjourn.
Provenance: The application and motion appear in the meeting transcript beginning with the commission’s announcement of the application for 126317 Cedar Drive and the subsequent motion to approve (topic introduced at SEG 027 through SEG 045). Commissioner Bren’s objection about drainage certification appears in SEG 050–SEG 061.
Next steps: The commission did not record follow-up direction in the transcript about seeking additional engineering certification for this specific application; the transcript records only the objection and the earlier approval motion.
