Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Industrial Rezone Idba topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission backs IDBA parcel rezoning but restricts development to 'light industrial'
Summary
The Madison County Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of a consolidated rezoning for several IDBA parcels along Highway 72 West but attached a condition limiting future development to light-industrial uses as described in the proposed UDC; residents raised concerns about traffic, runoff and the range of permitted industrial activities.
The Madison County Planning and Zoning Commission on the night voted to forward a consolidated rezoning request from the Madison County Industrial Development and Building Authority (IDBA) that would convert roughly 64.79 acres and several adjacent parcels along Highway 72 West to industrial use, but the recommendation includes a condition limiting allowed activity to light-industrial uses as described in the county’s proposed Unified Development Code.
Stephanie Wilson, appearing for the IDBA, told the commission the authority purchased the land to attract businesses consistent with the county comprehensive plan. Supporters said the move could create jobs and tax base; Russ Nace, a newly appointed IDBA member, told the commission the authority wants to choose tenants that bring employment opportunities. An IDBA representative said letters were distributed and offered direct contact information for residents with questions.
Opponents at the hearing urged more public engagement and raised concerns about traffic along Highway 72, stormwater runoff and the potential for heavy industrial uses that would be incompatible with nearby residences. One commenter warned that industrial uses could increase noise and truck traffic and asked whether the IDBA or the county would control future uses.
Board members discussed options for limiting intensity. A motion to recommend the consolidated rezoning carried with the explicit condition to restrict development to light-industrial uses. Commissioner discussion identified the proposed UDC light-industrial language as the starting point and requested staff to craft precise condition wording for inclusion in the Board of Commissioners packet. County Attorney Mike Pruitt and other commissioners said the IDBA could also use covenants but that zoning conditions provide a governmental backstop if needed.
The commission’s action is advisory; the Board of Commissioners will take final action on June 1. The commission directed staff to prepare final condition language referencing the proposed UDC definition (identified in discussion as section 2.10.5P) and to include that language in the materials the Board of Commissioners will review.
