Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Education topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House education committee approves amendment requiring schools to apply CTE credits and clarifying adult-diploma access

House of Education · May 21, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The House of Education voted 10-0-1 May 21 to approve an amendment to S 313 that clarifies how career and technical education (CTE) credits and proficiencies transfer and asks the Agency of Education to recommend ways adult-diploma participants can access CTE programs while meeting federal and state adult-education requirements.

The House of Education approved an amendment to S 313 on May 21 that clarifies how career and technical education (CTE) credits and proficiency-based assessments count toward high school graduation and asks the Agency of Education (AOE) to recommend how adult-diploma participants can access CTE programs.

The brief meeting opened with the Chair saying the committee would “meet briefly to vote on S 313,” describing the amendment as retracing language that came out of the Senate and incorporating a list of tasks for the AOE from a Commerce report. The Chair also said the amendment removes a proposed legislative working group on CTE governance because the issue has been studied extensively and related work is underway in Act 73.

A staff member walked the committee through three main edits in the amendment: converting a Commerce-recommended "pre-intervention pathway" for CTE disputes into an "early-stage mediation" process; adding a recommendation that adult-diploma program participants have access to educational programs that best serve their needs — including CTE — consistent with federal and state adult-education rules; and striking Section 8, which had proposed a legislative working group on CTE governance.

The committee then addressed technical language in Section 7 — replacing references to "grades" with "credits or proficiencies" and whether punctuation would change the statute's scope. The Chair read comments sent by Patty Fobwein and invited a presenter to summarize field concerns, noting that "the commas matter" and that the way the sentence is punctuated could affect whether credits are recognized program-by-program or simply because a CTE program is approved by the state board. The presenter said stakeholders fear that without a clarifying comma some individual courses might not be accepted across inter-district agreements.

Staff told the committee that the substantive change in the amendment requires the high school board "to apply credits or proficiencies earned for a CTE program approved by the state board toward graduation requirements," replacing prior discretion that allowed some school boards to decline to apply those credits. On whether adding the comma was legally necessary, staff said they did not believe the change would alter current practice but that they would make the punctuation change if the field reports confusion.

A committee member moved to approve the amendment. The Clerk conducted a roll-call vote: Representatives Bridal, Brown, Dobrevitch, Harpold, Hunter, Andre Long, Caselong, McCann, Quimby and Conlon voted yes; Representative Morgan was absent. The Chair announced the tally as 10-0-1 and said the amendment would be sent with the bill to the next committee that has possession.

The meeting concluded after the Chair confirmed the procedural next step.