Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Grading Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Anne Arundel board adopts limited class-rank policy after debate
Summary
The Board of Education approved a revision to Policy II (Grading) allowing students or parents to request a calculated class rank after the sophomore year; the measure passed 7'1 after board members debated potential mental-health effects and requested a one-year review of requests and usage.
The Anne Arundel County Board of Education voted to adopt a revised grading policy that permits calculation of a student's class rank upon request after the student's sophomore year, with the policy passing 7'1.
Grace Wilson, the district's director of legislation and policy, told the board the change was before them on third reading and noted staff had prepared a draft grading manual to accompany the policy. "Policy II grading is on third reading for final adoption this evening," she said, adding that the policy would allow rank to be provided "upon request of the student or the student's parent/guardian following a student's sophomore year."
Board members spent much of the discussion debating the merits and risks of restoring rank. "My own view is to ultimately support passing this policy," said Dr. Tobin, who asked that staff return in about a year with information on what requests are coming in and how they are being used. Several board members stressed that class rank should not affect valedictorian or Latin honors calculations; Wilson clarified that the board removed language allowing class rank to determine valedictorian, salutatorian or Latin honors.
Supporters said the policy provides a tool for students who need rank for scholarship or college applications. "Class rank opens a door for merit scholarships that makes college affordable to all students," one board member said, arguing the option helps first-generation applicants. Opponents worried about unintended social and mental-health impacts. At least one board member voted no, citing concerns about the return of a metric many districts have abandoned.
Superintendent Dr. Bedell framed the policy as giving families choice. He said staff will design a process for implementation only after the policy is finalized and that the district will share the procedure with sufficient lead time. "We will work to try to figure out and create themes and to try to make meaning of this data," he said, cautioning staff that qualitative limitations may make some analyses difficult.
The board's motion to approve Policy II was seconded and carried 7'1. The board recorded that the policy will be subject to final style and format corrections; members also requested a follow-up report in roughly one year documenting requests for rank, the reasons given and any equity or mental-health trends identified.
