Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Council Votes topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Votes at a glance: council adopts several measures including blanket purchase limit, job-description revisions and parking-lot contract

London City Council · May 22, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At the meeting the London City Council adopted several measures: Resolution 129-26 (increase blanket PO limit), Resolution 132-26 (job-description revisions), Resolution 133-26 (add parcels to Gateway Community Authority), Resolution 134-26 (authorize RFQ for NCA/TIF advisors), and Resolution 136-26 (parking-lot resurfacing contract authorization). Vote tallies recorded where available.

The London City Council took votes on multiple measures during the meeting. Summary of outcomes:

- Resolution 129-26 (amend blanket and super-blanket purchase order amount limits as required by ORC 5705.41) — Adopted on third reading. (Roll-call outcome recorded in meeting minutes; majority vote.)

- Resolution 132-26 (revising job descriptions) — Adopted 6–1 after council rejected an amendment to remove the street superintendent from the ordinance (amendment failed 1–6; adoption vote 6–1).

- Resolution 133-26 (determining sufficiency of application to add certain parcels to the London Gateway Community Authority, Madison Reserve Project) — Adopted by council; companion approval required from the Gateway board.

- Resolution 134-26 (authorize safety service director to advertise an RFQ for NCA and TIF advisors) — Adopted; council discussed using TIF funds or developer contributions to pay advisor fees.

- Resolution 136-26 (authorize advertising for bids and entering contract for Park Avenue parking-lot resurfacing, not to exceed $225,000) — Council moved to bypass three-reading rule and adopted the resolution in the same meeting (vote recorded as affirmative across council roster present).

Votes recorded in the minutes show some split decisions (notably the 1–6 failure on the amendment associated with 132-26), while several measures were adopted unanimously or by broad majorities. The council clerk and minutes record the roll-call names for each vote; for full roll-call details see meeting minutes.