Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Landfill Financing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commissioners table MES landfill bond request for detail, approve J. Richard Breeding contract after commissioner recusal

Caroline County Board of Commissioners · July 8, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board postponed consideration of a Maryland Environmental Service revenue bond resolution seeking roughly $28 million for two landfill cells pending MES cost breakdowns; the board later approved a bank‑run vendor contract for J. Richard Breeding Excavating after a commissioner recused from the vote.

The Caroline County Board of Commissioners on July 8 voted to table Resolution 2025‑020 — a Maryland Environmental Service request to issue revenue bonds to fund construction of two landfill cells — and asked MES to provide a cost breakdown and bid results before the matter returns to a future meeting.

A commissioner said the proposed two‑cell financing (roughly $28 million for the two cells as presented in the draft resolution) appeared large compared with prior cell construction costs and asked staff to obtain detail on bid results, minority participation impacts and the components of the requested amount. Staff agreed to invite MES to the July 22 meeting to present the requested clarifications.

Separately, commissioners removed from the consent agenda a vendor contract for bank run with J. Richard Breeding Excavating Incorporated to consider as an action item. One commissioner announced they would step aside for that item because of a potential conflict and turned the meeting to Commissioner Porter. After staff confirmed the procurement followed the county purchasing manual and that the lowest‑cost provider was presented, the board moved, seconded and approved the contract by voice vote.

No in‑person public comments were recorded on either item at the meeting. Commissioners directed staff to secure MES representatives for the next meeting to answer the cost and scope questions before final action on the bond resolution.