Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Building 110 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Agency official: stormwater fix clears path for Building 110 but boiler delays could push schedule
Summary
A joint Senate–House conference heard that a BGS stormwater solution for the Newport/Building 110 site removes a major impediment, but officials warned a long-lead boiler could delay the project by months if not ordered soon. Committee members will seek additional permit and procurement details before advancing the package.
Get email alerts on the Building 110 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
An interchamber committee on May 19 heard that the Department of Buildings and General Services (BGS) has identified a solution for the stormwater pond at the Newport/Building 110 site, removing what officials described as a key scheduling impediment, but that procurement for a replacement boiler remains a critical timeline risk.
The chair of the conference opened the meeting and said the committee expected an update from the House side and a briefing from the BGS commissioner on Building 110. A Committee member reported ongoing work to assemble the capital package and described outreach to agencies including ADS and BTS for background information.
An agency official told the conference that when BGS first met with the project team it did not have an approach for moving the site stormwater pond. "By the time that they came in and met with us, they had come up with a solution for how they were going to deal with the ponds," the official said, adding that the fix “basically took away the impediment to schedule" and put the project in a position to move forward.
The official also flagged the boiler as a long‑lead item. "If we don't move forward and get the long lead time items in the pipeline, we could potentially push the project out at least six months, maybe a year, depending on the timing," the official said. The official said the appropriation previously requested would not fund the entire project but would allow ordering long‑lead items and get the building procurement started so the project could finish in 2027.
Committee members said they remain in active conversations with BGS about a 3‑acre parcel at the site, noting some elements already have permits while others are expected to receive permits soon. Members requested further confirmation from BTS and ADS before finalizing positions. One member asked whether the construction window stretched to five years; the discussion did not produce a definitive end date.
The committee agreed to additional follow‑up conversations with agency staff (including EDS and stormwater utility contacts) that were not available at the meeting. Members discussed scheduling and availability, with plans to reconvene once the commissioner or other agency contacts could provide the outstanding technical and permitting details.
The conference paused while waiting for the BGS commissioner; with the commissioner delayed, members adjourned to allow time for the requested follow‑ups and to firm up the capital package before taking further action.
Next steps: committee staff will seek permit documentation and procurement timing from BGS and related agencies, finalize positions on the 3‑acre parcel and stormwater connections, and return to the committee once the commissioner or key technical staff are available.

