Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Devices topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Racine board weighs strict cell‑phone limits after mixed pilot results and research briefing
Summary
After a research-driven presentation and small pilots, Racine Unified trustees debated bell‑to‑bell phone bans, lockers/pouches, and software controls; administrators recommended a phased approach and asked the board for direction at a June work session.
Mr. Burns, the district staff member who led a detailed explainer, told the board the district faces a “daily digital deluge,” saying middle‑school students can receive “300 notifications” on an average day and arguing that physical separation of devices improves focus. He cited Wisconsin Act 42 — the new state requirement to ban phone use during instructional time by 2026–27 — and summarized research that correlates phone proximity with lower GPAs when devices remain in reach.
The presentation ran through three broad policy options: maintain the current law‑driven instruction‑time restriction, require phones to be secured (lockers or Faraday pouches) bell‑to‑bell, or ban phones from campus entirely. Mr. Burns warned of enforcement challenges, noting peripheral devices (smartwatches, earbuds) and medical/IEP exceptions and estimating pouch costs in the range of $25–$30 per student.
Administrators from pilot schools described mixed results. Erica Harris Day, principal at Gford K–8 schools, said a TRUCE app pilot enrolled about a dozen families after initial outreach; participation fell off and the school encountered workarounds and compatibility issues. Park High principal Bill Melly said the TRUCE rollout blocked too many apps (including some educational functions) and lacked sufficient parent buy‑in.
Trustees focused on tradeoffs: some urged a firm, consistent bell‑to‑bell policy to reduce classroom distraction and filming of incidents; others raised equity, safety and logistical concerns, including students who use phones for medical reasons, translation or transportation. Several board members pressed for clear cost estimates and recommended phased pilots — for middle schools first or a single high school — rather than districtwide immediate rollout.
Superintendent Gayeski asked the board to give staff direction and return with implementation details at the June work session. The board did not vote on a specific policy; members instead requested more information about costs, timing, handling protocols and how exceptions (medical, IEPs, translators) would be managed.
Next steps: administration will present pilot timing, cost estimates and staffing implications for the June work session so the board can consider a phased implementation or targeted pilots.
