Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission forwards two options on building‑eligibility transfer rules to county commissioners
Summary
After wide public comment, the commission voted to send two options to the Board of County Commissioners: (1) remove the same‑ownership requirement for transferring building eligibilities and (2) remove same‑ownership but restrict transfers to within the same township — the board will remand for a formal public hearing if it chooses.
The Lincoln County Planning Commission on May 12 voted unanimously to forward a draft amendment on building‑eligibility transfers to the county board with two alternative options, after extended public input from farmers and residents.
Staff told the commission the 1995 ordinance that created density‑based building eligibilities has created a cumbersome process for property owners who want to move an eligibility; the current 'same‑ownership' requirement often produces quick‑deed workarounds and legal costs. "The same‑ownership requirement is something that should be looked at and updated," county planner Toby Brower said, explaining staff's view that removing same‑ownership would remove unnecessary transactional steps.
Public speakers offered multiple alternatives and concerns during the public input period. Suggestions included selling eligibilities through the county for a fixed fee, restricting transfers to within a township to preserve local tax revenue, using a lottery or auction mechanism, and preserving a path for multigenerational farms to regain eligibilities. Speakers emphasized balancing property rights, township revenue, and opportunities for young or returning family farmers.
Commissioner Boots moved to forward the draft with two options (remove same‑ownership; or remove same‑ownership but restrict transfers to within the township); Commissioner Scott seconded and the motion passed by roll call. The Board of County Commissioners will receive the recommendations and may remand a draft back to the planning commission for a formal public hearing and a recommendation.
Next steps: If the county board remands a preferred option, the planning commission will schedule a public hearing and make a recommendation to the board.
Reporting note: The subject raised complex fiscal and land‑use tradeoffs; both options were forwarded to the board to allow county‑level deliberation and further public process.
