Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Strategic Plan topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board reviews draft strategic plan; members push for clearer indicators and tighter wording on digital tools

Davis School District Board Workshop · May 19, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board members reviewed a draft strategic plan shaped by broad stakeholder input, debated ordering and readability of key indicators (favoring academic growth/proficiency near the top) and agreed to language emphasizing 'responsible use of digital tools to support learning.'

Board members and district staff spent most of the workshop reviewing a draft strategic plan that staff said was shaped by input from 805 stakeholders across students, community councils, teachers, PTA leaders and other groups. Superintendent-designate and board leadership framed the draft as a concise document of focus areas, philosophy statements, and key indicators to guide board priorities.

Why it matters: The strategic plan will govern board-level expectations and measurement priorities for the district. President Gerard and other board members emphasized the plan should be readable and implementable while retaining flexibility for seven years of application. Board members debated whether to display key indicators in a strict order (which risks implying ranking) or to prioritize document readability by highlighting a small set of primary indicators.

On measurement: Several board members argued academic proficiency and growth should be prominent in the academic achievement indicators, while others cautioned against strict rank-ordering that could de-emphasize other goals. "If we keep this in the strategic plan space properly, then the idea of indicators aligning with goals is one of the feedback points that I was like, 'Hmm, that's a good thought,'" one board member said during the discussion.

On digital tools: Board members and staff negotiated wording for a digital-resources goal. Feedback from community sessions had included calls both for "less tech" and for guidance about instructional use; the group settled on phrasing along the lines of assuring "responsible use of digital tools to support learning," to balance safety, instruction, and adaptability.

Implementation and next steps: Staff said most feedback was in the "polishing" phase and that small wording changes would be made administratively; substantive changes would be brought back to the board for direction. Board members asked staff to prioritize clarity in key indicators and to prepare a web-based presentation (with definitions and hyperlinks) to help parents and community members understand terms and measurement reports.

What's next: Staff will incorporate minor wording edits and prepare the web presentation; substantial or structural changes will be returned to the board for formal direction before adoption.