Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel Files topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lakeland District policy committee debates limits on personnel-file access and notice timelines
Summary
The Lakeland District policy committee reviewed draft policy 5500 on personnel files, debating who may access records (superintendents, principals, directors), what documents belong in official files, and whether employees should have seven business days or 21 days to submit rebuttals; the committee sent the revisions for further review at the June 17 board meeting.
The Lakeland District policy committee on Tuesday reviewed draft policy 5500, which defines what the district keeps in employee personnel files and who may inspect them. A staff member read the draft, which limits routine access to the superintendent, principal, supervisor (or director), the employee, the district’s designee and, for hiring checks, other Idaho public schools invoking Idaho Code 33-1210.
Committee members pressed for clearer language about supervisory titles. One trustee said head custodians and noninstructional paraprofessionals perform supervisory tasks but likely should not have file-access rights; staff and trustees discussed whether the term "director" should replace or sit alongside "supervisor" to reflect district titles without expanding access.
The draft instructs that inspections by persons other than the superintendent, principal or administrative staff must be logged with date and time, the requester’s name, a description of records copied and the initials of the staff member providing access. Committee members noted the policy text omits a clear definition of "administrative staff" and asked that directors be explicitly classified in the policy language if intended.
The committee debated notice and rebuttal timelines. The draft alternated between a 10-day notice window and a seven-business-day rebuttal period; members compared a 21-day model used by Coeur d'Alene and an Idaho School Boards Association template. After discussion, several trustees said the consistent practice in the district has been seven business days from receipt of notice for an employee to file a rebuttal, and they favored language that reads "seven business days from receipt of notice." The committee did not adopt final wording and asked staff to return with clarified draft language.
The staff also reviewed what documents should be kept in official files—application materials, contracts, performance evaluations, reprimands, certifications, transcripts and acknowledgements of district policies—and suggested that supervisor notes be placed in personnel files only when they are relevant to evaluation. The draft makes letters of recommendation a sealed portion of the file and specifies that investigative materials be redacted for names of students and complainants before inclusion.
The draft reiterates payroll-record requirements that mirror the federal Fair Labor Standards Act—employee name as used for Social Security, address, I-9s, basis of pay, hours worked, overtime and compensatory-time records—and committee members asked whether certain exemption references used in the draft (for example, 207k exemptions) should be clarified.
The policy committee will send the updated draft for additional review and has scheduled the revised policy for the June 17 board meeting. No formal vote was taken on policy 5500 during this session.
