Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the District Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board discusses Vision 2030 progress and debates role of screens and personal devices in classrooms
Summary
Board leaders reviewed Vision 2030 goal progress across Journey competencies, culture/climate, facilities, programs and engagement. The meeting included a lengthy discussion about technology in schools, with students and board members weighing benefits of digital tools against concerns about distraction and screen time.
The Ridgewood Board of Education on May 19 received a multi‑part update on the district’s Vision 2030 goals and spent substantial time debating the role of screens and personal devices in classrooms.
Administration described Year‑1 progress on five strategic goals: the Journey of a Graduate competency framework, balanced culture and climate (mental health and MTSS), infrastructure and finance (master facilities planning and vendor management), programs and pathways (K–12 academics, gifted services and AI guidance) and engagement/communications (branding, website accessibility and alumni outreach).
Mrs. Jamie Murphy and other goal leads summarized concrete deliverables: competency rubrics, portfolio pilots for grades 5/8/11–12, competency tags in curriculum Atlas, expanded counseling and post‑secondary pathway options, improved vendor oversight, and a forthcoming communications survey and branding kit.
A wide‑ranging discussion followed about classroom technology. Students, teachers and board members all participated. Student speakers said a balanced approach — using online simulations (Gizmos) alongside hands‑on labs — has been useful in physics and chemistry classes. One student said online simulations “helped because sometimes you don't get the results that you're supposed to” in a live lab; another pointed to the lasting value of a teacher’s in‑class demonstration.
Board members expressed concern about distraction and the difficulty of monitoring personally owned devices. The superintendent framed it as a training and policy issue: technology can ‘hijack’ attention if students lack digital self‑regulation, and the district needs consistent teaching about digital use across grades. Several trustees urged a community‑wide discussion and asked staff to convene students, parents and teachers next year to shape device policies and supports.
No device ban was proposed; instead the board asked staff to create a plan for community engagement and clearer guidance on device expectations, monitoring tools, and digital literacy instruction. Administrators said they would include the conversation in goal‑related outreach and return with recommendations.
The meeting closed after two public comments on class‑size decisions and transportation; the board moved into executive session for personnel matters.
