Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the New Construction topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
New-construction review at 951 Northeast 16th Street pushed to second review over setbacks, lot-coverage and privacy concerns
Summary
The Village of Biscayne Park review board continued the application for a new two-story house at 951 Northeast 16th Street after staff flagged unclear lot-coverage calculations, side-yard wall-length limits at 10-foot setbacks and second-floor window privacy requirements; the applicant was told to return with revised plans and a full coverage breakdown.
The Village of Biscayne Park building reviewers moved the new-construction application for 951 Northeast 16th Street to a second review, citing unresolved lot-coverage calculations, side-yard setback limits and privacy concerns for second-floor windows.
Staff told the applicant that the code allows only 30 linear feet of wall at a 10-foot side setback before the remainder of the wall must step back to a 15-foot setback. "On the second floor you can have 30 feet at the 10-foot setback. Anything above 30 feet has to be at 15 feet back," the staff member said, advising the applicant to break up or step back elevations to comply.
The board also emphasized that elements that "touch the ground" count toward lot coverage: driveways, approaches, AC and generator pads, and accessory structures such as pools and pool decks. Staff asked the applicant to provide a line-item breakdown (pool, building footprint, driveways, equipment pads) because current plans did not make the total coverage clear. "If you take off those pieces ... you're going to be closer to 50," the staff member said, referring to the village's 50% lot-coverage ceiling.
Privacy for neighboring properties was another sticking point. Staff directed that windows on the rear two-thirds of the second floor must be detailed to "diminish visibility" into adjacent yards — for example by using high windows or frosted glass — and suggested removing or redesigning sightline-critical windows.
Board members and staff recommended that the applicant redraft elevations to provide articulated wall planes and at least two roof levels as required under the village architectural standards (section 10.3 of the land‑development code) and to submit an updated survey and tree survey if required. The board continued the matter to a second-review slot; staff said the applicant should upload the revised materials and a detailed lot-coverage worksheet before the next review.
