Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rezoning Commercial Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Applicant and realtor back garden-center plan for Rutledge Lane; staff flags sewer and annexation as barriers
Summary
James Westmoreland’s request to reclassify about 7.02 acres at 65 and 85 Rutledge Lane for commercial use and rezone from A1 to C2 drew testimony from applicant representative Xander Puckett and realtor Todd Elliott; staff opposed the request because commercial use would require sanitary sewer and annexation, but suggested suburban commercial as a more suitable compromise if annexation occurs.
Get email alerts on the Rezoning Commercial Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At a meeting whose governing body and date were not specified in the transcript, staff opposed a future land-use amendment and rezoning proposal for 65 and 85 Rutledge Lane and described annexation and sewer access as the principal obstacles to commercial development.
Staff said the proposal would change the future land-use designation from rural preservation open space to interchange commercial and rezone about 7.02 acres from A1 to C2. The staff member told the assembly that because the property is not within city limits, any new commercial use would likely require connection to sanitary sewer and thus annexation, and recommended suburban commercial as a more suitable designation if the body gives a positive recommendation.
Applicant representative Xander Puckett of Puckett Supply Co. told the meeting he is seeking to purchase the property to establish a permanent landscape supply store, said the business has received positive neighbor feedback and that suburban commercial would be acceptable "as long as it supports the C2 rezoning through the county." Todd Elliott, a realtor representing Mr. Westmoreland, vouched for the applicants and urged the body to consider their application.
The transcript records staff repeating that annexation and sewer access are controlling issues and does not show a final vote or decision on the request during the meeting.

