Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council advances ordinances on roosters, reasonable accommodations and vehicle-storage zoning
Summary
The council moved forward on several land-use and code changes: it approved on first reading an explicit prohibition on roosters, clarified reasonable-accommodation appeal procedures (adding the Disabled Access Appeals Board route), and adopted a first reading to prohibit vehicle-storage uses within the IR + multifamily overlay on Garden Road, with public comment and one property owner requesting an exemption.
On May 19 the Monterey City Council advanced three code amendments addressing animal control, disability accommodations and land-use limits in overlay zones.
Rooster prohibition: Planning staff proposed code edits to specifically distinguish hens from roosters and to prohibit roosters in city limits to resolve recurring complaints. Council approved the first reading after public support and questions about enforcement and setbacks. Staff said enforcement would remain complaint-driven through code enforcement and existing setback rules (including a 100-foot property-line setback for larger numbers of fowl) remain unchanged.
Reasonable accommodations: Staff proposed clarifying the city’s "reasonable accommodation" procedure (state law requires local processes) by adding an explicit appeal route to the Disabled Access Appeals Board for applicants denied administratively and by removing duplicative review when a request accompanies a discretionary land-use application. The change also requires the city to provide assistance to appellants to help ensure the appeal process is accessible in practice. Council approved the first reading.
Vehicle-storage zoning: As part of implementing the adopted housing element, staff recommended prohibiting vehicle-storage lots (commercial storage of autos, RVs, buses) in industrial parcels that carry the multifamily overlay on the south side of Garden Road to protect preferred multifamily development sites. A property owner asked for an exclusion, arguing a long history of industrial use; staff said legally established and continuously operating nonconforming uses could be protected if documented. Council adopted the first reading; the item drew public comment from the owner and neighbors.
Why this matters: The series of ordinances contains routine but important regulatory clarifications — the rooster ban addresses quality-of-life complaints, the reasonable-accommodation change strengthens due-process and accessibility for disabled applicants, and the vehicle-storage restriction protects housing-priority sites identified in the housing element.
What to watch: Staff will prepare final ordinance language and return for second readings where required; implementation and enforcement details (setback application, appeals assistance and documentation of any nonconforming vehicle-storage uses) merit follow-up.
