Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Curriculum Adoption topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves one-year extension of math curriculum as state standards remain unsettled

Ogden City School District Board of Education · May 21, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The district approved a one-year extension of K–8 and secondary math materials while the Utah State Board delays a decision on math standards (debate over integrated vs. traditional sequencing); the transcript lists the district's projected one-year cost as '$332,96 and some change' (amount unclear).

The Ogden School District board voted to extend its current adopted mathematics curriculum for one year to allow time for the Utah State Board of Education to finish a delayed review of state math standards.

Adam McMichel, director of student achievement, told the board the state review centers on whether to keep the integrated secondary sequence (secondary Math 1–3) or revert to a traditional sequence (Algebra, Geometry, Algebra II). "Because the state board has taken a little more time and has actually brought in an external evaluator to review the standards, we need an extension year so we can align the RFP to the final standards," McMichel said.

McMichel said the one-year continuation would cover the district's K–5 and middle-grade materials and allow staff to run an RFP aligned to the finalized state standards. He told the board the transcript-listed projected cost for the single-year investment was recorded as "$332,96 and some change," which is unclear on the audio record; staff characterized the amount as a single-year budgetary commitment to maintain continuity for teachers and students.

Board members asked whether a faster RFP process was feasible; McMichel replied that a rushed procurement would impose an abbreviated implementation cycle and likely force a year-one implementation for teachers, which he and staff preferred to avoid.

The board moved and seconded a motion to approve the one-year extension and voted in favor.

What happens next: staff plan to monitor the state board's decision, then issue an RFP in the fall and bring a recommended longer-term contract to the board once state standards are finalized.