Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Definition Of Family topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council hears public‑hearing presentation on changing “family” definition; planners flag short‑term rental consequences
Summary
Senior planner Mary Brunner told the Keene City Council that a proposed ordinance to reframe “family” around non‑transiency (occupancy longer than 30 days) is required by state law and could affect occupancy limits, congregate living categories and short‑term rentals; councilors sought clarifications on student housing and enforcement.
The Keene City Council opened and closed a public hearing on ordinance O2026‑02, which would revise the city’s definition of “family” to align with recent changes in state law (referenced in the presentation as RSA 674:16). Senior planner Mary Brunner told the council the draft replaces relationship‑based rules with a definition that focuses on the household’s non‑transient character.
“Family shall mean a natural person living alone or a group of natural persons living together as a single housekeeping unit that is primarily non‑transient,” Brunner said, reading the proposed definition and explaining that “transient” is defined for the draft as occupancy for less than 30 consecutive days or rentals shorter than one month.
Brunner said the change was prompted by the state statute and noted three likely ripple effects: (1) the city’s prior occupancy limit tied to a four‑unrelated‑people rule would be removed; (2) a range of congregate‑living/social‑service land‑use categories could be affected and are being reviewed separately; and (3) short‑term rentals could become technically prohibited unless the council adopts a separate short‑term‑rental ordinance because the family definition focuses on non‑transiency. Brunner estimated roughly 50 active short‑term rental listings in Keene.
Councilors asked how the change would affect college housing. Brunner said the key enforcement metric would be the 30‑day threshold and how occupants “function together” (for example, sharing meals or shopping together) — factors that would be used to determine whether a group constitutes a household unit. Several councilors also asked whether the municipality could set per‑bedroom occupant limits; staff responded that state law permits some regulation of occupancy but cautioned against rules that could inadvertently displace larger families.
On short‑term rental timing, staff said interim enforcement would be discretionary: if the family definition is adopted before a separate short‑term‑rental ordinance is finalized, short‑term rentals would technically be disallowed, but the city would exercise enforcement discretion while the separate ordinance proceeds through the review process.
The public hearing closed with no speakers from the floor; the council said written comments will be accepted until 1:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 9 so the Planning, Licenses & Development (PLLD) committee can consider them before its June 10 meeting.
Next steps: The ordinance will be taken up by the PLLD committee for additional review, and staff are developing a parallel short‑term‑rental ordinance to address the transition.
