Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Works Alley Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
North St. Paul Council approves rules for private improvements to public alley segments
Summary
The City Council approved a new process letting property owners pave or otherwise improve segments of public alleys under a recorded encroachment agreement, with application and escrow fees and minimum engineering standards, after a presentation from Community Development Director Ken Roberts.
Community Development Director Ken Roberts told the North St. Paul City Council the city currently has no formal method to allow property owners to improve public alley segments and proposed a process to fill that gap. "We don't have a process or method on the books," Roberts said, outlining a pre‑application site visit, application materials, inspection steps and a recorded legal agreement.
Under the approved procedure, applicants would pay an application fee of $500 and a $1,000 escrow intended to cover legal and engineering review costs, Roberts said. Improvements would be permitted only for alley segments (not full through‑alley public projects), and would require a recorded encroachment or encroachment‑style agreement placing long‑term maintenance responsibility on the affected property owners.
The council endorsed specific construction standards Roberts described: a minimum compacted base (about 8 inches of gravel or suitable recycled base), a paved surfacing requirement (a minimum of 3 inches of bituminous paving or roughly 5–6 inches of concrete), and a typical paved width of 12 feet unless the public works director approves a narrower section. The policy also requires maintaining existing drainage patterns and installing erosion controls during construction, and requires a final inspection and city engineer sign‑off before acceptance of the work.
Council members asked staff to include a notification process for all properties that abut an alley segment proposed for private improvement, so adjacent owners can opt in to a larger project or register objections. Members also discussed adding signage at the paved segment to show it is not a through street and addressing snow‑plow and drainage needs.
Roberts said the legal instrument would be drafted by the city attorney and recorded against property titles so future owners are aware the improvement is private. "The owners are responsible for that and the city is not," he said, describing the intent to avoid future disputes about maintenance obligations.
The council voted to approve the procedures, criteria, standards and application fees and directed staff to implement the process. The motion passed by voice vote with all present members in favor.
Next steps: staff will draft the final application materials and agreement language for administrative use and begin the outreach/notification process for affected properties.
