Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Bill Allocations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee trims and ties capital allocations for Newport parcel, St. Johnsbury and other projects
Summary
Members reviewed a capital spreadsheet tied to a 3‑acre Newport parcel and agreed to restructure funding (zeroing $1 million cash, adding bonded amounts and rounding to a $5 million package), discussed pushing back on using bonded dollars for small recovery‑house repairs, proposed returning historic grant caps to $300,000, and recommended removing bonded tech support funding.
Committee members reviewed an updated capital spreadsheet and several contested line items tied to the broader capital bill. Members said a 3‑acre parcel connected to the Newport facility should be funded through a mix of cash and bonds; the presenters proposed zeroing out $1 million in cash, adding roughly $500,000 in bonded terms and rounding to a $5 million package that would include stormwater work and boiler funds.
Members discussed moving money toward a St. Johnsbury door replacement tied administratively to the same packet and noted that the 3‑acre accounting would support multiple site needs. Committee members also pushed back on using bonded capital dollars for small recovery house projects such as baseboard, cabinetry and temporary stairs, arguing the capital bill should not be opened to numerous piecemeal projects.
On historic grants, members reiterated past commitments to parity across grant programs and proposed returning caps to $300,000 for certain grant lines. The committee also questioned using bonding for tech support (noting annual administration costs) and proposed zeroing that bonded request.
Separately, members reported they would accept stormwater utility language in exchange for allowing sale of a parcel described in the spreadsheet as '110 state.' Staff requested further information from ANR on stormwater implications and agreed to return with more detail.
The committee did not record formal roll‑call votes in the transcript; members instructed staff to produce revised spreadsheet numbers and proposed language for further review.
