Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wind Energy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
NextEra presents draft road-use and impact-fee agreements for Glendive Wind project to Macomb County commissioners
Summary
NextEra Energy representative Ross Fien called into a Macomb County meeting to deliver draft road-use and impact-fee agreements and a turbine-location map for the Glendive Wind Project. He said the company proposes 13 turbines for Macomb County, would pay to repair and restore roads, and offered a decommissioning bond; residents pressed for environmental review and urged a moratorium.
Ross Fien, calling from NextEra Energy Resources, told Macomb County commissioners that he had sent three documents to their commissioner email addresses: a draft road-use agreement, a draft impact-fee agreement and the current map of proposed turbine locations for the Glendive Wind Project.
Fien said the impact-fee draft would offer "the maximum allowed impact fee here, which the formula is 0.5% of the amount that's invested in that county," payable for three years starting when construction begins (the county would receive the fees the following tax year). He described the road-use agreement as beginning with a road and traffic study and a video baseline inventory of roads to be used, conducted with the county road department, and said NextEra would pay 100% of construction-related road work and repairs and would post a decommissioning bond at construction.
Why it matters: the agreements define who pays for study, repair and long-term restoration of county roads, how much revenue the county might receive from impact fees, and what assurances—such as a decommissioning bond—are in place to prevent taxpayers from covering cleanup costs if the project later ceases operation.
Details and public questions Fien said the project map provided to commissioners shows turbine placements (not transmission lines) and that the current proposal includes 13 turbines in Macomb County, a bit over 40 turbines in Dawson County and a little over 200 turbines across the entire project footprint. When asked about environmental review, he said the project has performed and is performing studies (for example, at least two years of bird studies) and that formal environmental assessments or an environmental impact statement would proceed under state and federal processes, including NEPA and the Montana Environmental Policy Act.
On decommissioning, Fien said the company would post a decommissioning bond and offered to post that bond at construction (earlier than legal minimums) and to update it every five years to reflect inflation and cost changes. He said contractual clauses typically require decommissioning to begin within 12 months of ceasing operations.
Public commenters pressed several topics. Scott Brown, who identified himself as working in local electric services while also selling real estate and farming, asked about turbine counts; Fien confirmed the county and total counts above. Multiple residents asked whether final study reports would be public; Fien said final reports are public documents at the state and federal level. One resident urged counties to seek specialized counsel, called federal renewable subsidies a "boondoggle," and urged a moratorium or interim zoning to pause development while the counties consider rules. That commenter said, in part, "They're throwing back money to you that they have taken from you. That's a fact," and urged the commissioners to consider an interim zoning moratorium.
Responses from NextEra and next steps Fien described the agreements as drafts intended for discussion and revision and said NextEra is open to county feedback and to working "shoulder to shoulder" with local road departments on studies and repairs. He also said NextEra is a long-term owner-operator in many projects and identified the project entity as Glendive Wind LLC, a wholly owned NextEra Energy Resources subsidiary. On taxes and assessment questions, Fien referred commissioners to the state Department of Revenue for valuation and depreciation tables and said the economic-impact report provided to the county includes projections.
No formal vote or decision on the draft agreements was taken at the meeting. Commissioners asked for time to review the emailed documents and asked for transmission-line routing to be shared later; NextEra said it would follow up and accept questions after officials have had time to digest the materials.
Ending The meeting closed with commissioners thanking the caller and residents for their questions. Next procedural steps identified by participants were: county review of the drafts, follow-up from NextEra with road and transmission-route materials, and potential legal review by county counsel before any binding agreement is adopted.
