Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Signage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Willows looks to tighten sign chapter, add feather-flag definition and limit temporary banners
Summary
Councilors discussed adding clearer definitions for flags, feather flags and banners, limiting perpetual feather flags and temporary signs to business hours or short grand-opening windows, and noted enforcement challenges for daily removal requirements.
The joint meeting resumed after a short break to consider the comprehensive sign law (chapter 18.125). Staff opened the sign chapter review and members concentrated on several practical items: whether the chapter's general provisions properly cross-reference district-specific sign rules, how to define banners, flags and feather flags, and realistic enforcement approaches for temporary signs.
Councilors and staff proposed adding an explicit definition for 'feather flag' distinct from pole or freestanding signs and discussed allowing feather flags only during business hours or for limited grand-opening periods. Several members warned about the enforcement burden of requiring nightly removal: "Who monitors that? Who tracks that?" one member asked. The committee recommended keeping some temporary-sign allowances (for short periods) while prohibiting certain visually disruptive signs such as tattered feather flags, inflated promotional devices and unattended sidewalk dance characters.
Members also asked staff to clarify whether city banners (for anniversaries or city events) qualify as temporary signs under the definition and recommended a short list of permitted temporary sign durations (for example, 30 to 90 days for special events or grand openings) with clear permit procedures. Staff said they would tighten the draft definitions, add a feather-flag entry and consider enforcement practicality in the next revision.
