Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Airport topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Meriwether County agrees to cap local match at $200,000 for FAA‑funded airport apron repair
Summary
After extended discussion about FAA rules, engineering fees and bids, the commission approved a county contribution not to exceed $200,000 as the local match for a roughly $1.2 million FAA‑funded apron/ramp rehabilitation project. Commissioners pressed staff for clarity on engineer fees and the bidding process.
Meriwether County commissioners voted April 13 to authorize a county contribution capped at $200,000 to secure roughly $1,000,000 in federal FAA funding for a planned $1.2 million apron and ramp rehabilitation at the county airport.
The airport authority had requested roughly $200,000 as the county’s share while the FAA would provide the bulk of the grant. "We're asking for a cap of $200,000," an airport representative said during the meeting, noting the FAA and the state aviation office would fund the remainder of the $1.2 million project. Commissioners debated whether the county must use an FAA‑approved engineering firm and questioned engineering management fees, which were described in the meeting as roughly 10–16 percent of the project cost.
Why it matters: commissioners said the apron is deteriorating and that FAA inspection flagged the ramp, creating a near‑term need to move quickly to preserve federal funding and avoid more costly future repairs or restrictions. Airport officials and staff said an FAA inspection found the ramp area needing attention; doing the work now would preserve the runway length and the airport’s standing with FAA funding programs.
Board members pressed staff on alternatives that might save money. One commissioner said using the county’s existing engineer could save an estimated $75,000; airport staff and the airport engineer responded that the work requires firms with FAA experience and must comply with FAA specifications and inspection requirements. "The FAA comes out and inspects it; their specs are what determine final acceptance," the airport representative said, adding that eligible contractors must meet FAA guidelines.
What the board approved and next steps: the board approved a motion to cap the county contribution at $200,000 and directed staff to proceed with advertising the project and returning with contract documents and bid results. Staff emphasized the final funding allocation will be adjusted by a budget amendment once bids are received and the county’s available excess revenue is clearer. The county intends to use excess revenue or other identified funds for the match; if the contract award requires additional county funding, it will return to the board for further action.
During the discussion commissioners asked staff to confirm the standard percentage the county pays project managers and to provide final contract scope and specs before awarding the work. The county will also set project timelines consistent with FAA inspection cycles and seasonal paving constraints.
The commission’s action makes it more likely the FAA grant will be accessed this year and allows staff to proceed with the bidding and procurement steps required to begin work this summer if weather and contracting timelines permit.
