Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Facilities Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Orting board hears schematic designs and fast‑track timeline for new elementary and CTE wing
Summary
District staff reported that schematic design packages for the new elementary school and the CTE wing have been issued; pricing and reconciliation with contractors is underway, permits are targeted in July, and the bond oversight committee has been convened to review design and scope.
Get email alerts on the Facilities Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Orting School District staff told the board that schematic design packages for both the new elementary school and the career and technical education (CTE) wing have been issued and are now in pricing and reconciliation phases.
Facilities lead Liz said the elementary school schematic package was issued about three weeks earlier and the CTE package followed shortly after. District consultants and Scansa (the construction partner) are performing concurrent cost estimates and a reconciliation process; staff said value engineering discussions are underway to align the design with budget parameters.
Liz said owner‑consultant and geotechnical work is complete for the high school CTE site, user‑group meetings are starting to review finishes and cabinetry, and the district has targeted July dates for a site plan permit application and architectural design review. She added that pilings and steel erection timelines would follow—pilings were described as a roughly 10‑week task and steel erection about nine weeks—so staff estimated a year until breaking ground on the elementary project if schedules hold.
The district has formed a bond oversight committee that has met multiple times and provided input on design and fiscal matters; district staff said the committee includes about a dozen community members and that city council members have been engaged on priorities such as local labor and student involvement in the project.
Board members asked about value engineering and community benefit; staff replied that value engineering is intended to select equivalent systems by cost and longevity rather than reduce long‑term quality. Staff said they will return to the board with reconciled pricing and recommended adjustments to keep projects within the approved bond scope.
No motion was taken; the board received the report and will see additional materials at a July meeting as pricing work and permit scheduling proceed.

