Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Parking Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council defers decision on abeyance agreement for commercial parking at 1400 E. Tuohy after debate over compliance fine
Summary
Council members debated a proposed compliance and temporary abeyance agreement that would allow a commercial parking operation at 1400 E. Tuohy Ave. to continue while the owner pursues rezoning; staff recommended a $70,000 compliance fine, some aldermen sought $150,000, an amendment was withdrawn, and the council deferred the item to the second March meeting pending a written rationale from the applicant.
The Des Plaines City Council discussed, but did not approve, a compliance and temporary abeyance agreement for a commercial parking operation at 1400 East Tuohy Ave.
Staff told the council the property owner is requesting approval of an agreement that would allow a commercial parking use to continue while the owner submits applications for rezoning and a conditional-use permit. Staff noted the property is approximately 4.76 acres with a multi-story office building and that the city issued a cease-and-desist letter in December 2023 related to the commercial parking operation.
As part of the proposed agreement the applicant offered a one-time compliance payment of $70,000. The applicant's representative, Michael Potarelli of Bradford Allen, and counsel Carl Camalucci (Taft law firm) addressed the council. Traffic engineer Peter Lehi (the firm named in the packet) explained the site plan and parking-count data: 404 total spaces were identified in the most recent survey, of which 161 are tenant spaces and 213 are signed for commercial off-site parking; mean utilization of the commercial spaces averaged roughly 109 vehicles on studied days.
Council members pressed the owner about continuing commercial parking after the city's cease-and-desist in Dec. 2023. Counsel said the $70,000 figure was derived from estimating roughly 50,000 "parking days" from Dec. 2023 to July 2025 and the city's $1-per-car parking tax (yielding about $50,000 in tax-equivalent revenue), with additional months bringing the total near $69,000 and the applicant choosing $70,000 as a reasonable settlement amount. Alderman Walston proposed increasing the compliance payment to $150,000; the motion to amend to $150,000 was debated, seconded, then withdrawn so the owner could provide a written rationale for a different payment.
By unanimous consent the council deferred consideration of the agreement to the second March meeting and asked the applicant to submit a packet rationale for any alternative compliance payment. Staff said the packet must include the applicant's rationale and supporting data if the matter returns to council for a vote.
