Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Commercial Setback topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

BZA recommends denial of setback variances for proposed veterinary clinic in Newnan

Coweta County Board of Zoning Appeals · April 23, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The BZA recommended denial of front‑setback variances requested by Blue Frog Engineering on behalf of TSP LLC for a proposed two‑story veterinary clinic at South Highway 29 and Pine Road, concluding staff had not demonstrated the hardship standard given developable areas for parking and stormwater outside the building envelope.

The Coweta County Board of Zoning Appeals recommended denial of variance petition 26‑0001, which sought reduced front setbacks along South Highway 29 and Pine Road for a proposed two‑story, roughly 5,500‑square‑foot veterinary clinic on a 1.7‑acre parcel in the Quality Development Corridor overlay.

Zoning coordinator Nicole Blackwell described the constrained parcel and the applicant’s request: a reduction from the 135‑foot centerline measurement on Highway 29 to 105 feet (a 30‑foot reduction) and a reduction along Pine Road from a 100‑foot right‑of‑way standard to 60 feet (a 40‑foot reduction). Staff noted that required setbacks, a utility easement and right‑of‑way limits combine to shrink the developable building envelope but also proposed conditions if the board recommended approval.

Blue Frog Engineering’s Kai Burke and TSP owner Shelby Tidwell said the three‑frontage parcel and proposed access through the adjacent Dollar General constrained workable building placement and justified the variances to allow appropriate circulation and buffering.

Board members questioned whether parking, stormwater detention and circulation could be accommodated outside the stricter building envelope; several members said they did not see the hardship required under Article 28 and moved to recommend denial. The board voted to recommend denial of the variances. The matter will be transmitted to the Board of Commissioners for final action on May 19.