Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Right Of Way topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission backs code changes to streamline right-of-way encroachment licenses
Summary
By unanimous vote, the commission recommended approval of CDA000039, a staff-initiated amendment to clarify and streamline the right-of-way encroachment license process, expand administrative review, and clarify liability and submittal requirements.
The Glenwood Springs Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously May 26 to recommend City Council approve Planning File CDA000039, a code amendment that clarifies the city's right-of-way encroachment license process and increases administrative review for minor encroachments.
Jim Hardcastle, presenting the staff recommendation, said the amendment bundles five groups of changes: clarifying administrative review and applicability, revising authority so the director may review and approve some encroachments while retaining City Council review for others, identifying a site plan as an acceptable submittal, correcting a longstanding error that named the planning commission as approving body, and clarifying when umbrella liability insurance is required.
Hardcastle summarized the function of an encroachment license: "A right of way encroachment essentially is the placement of a private item ... into a city street, sidewalk or other city property," which can range from retaining walls to permanent foundations, he said. Staff told commissioners the goal is a more efficient, less costly process for applicants and staff when impacts are minor and predictable.
Commissioners asked how this differs from temporary right-of-way permits; staff explained permits cover temporary work (for example, construction-related occupation of the right of way) while a license covers more permanent fixtures that the city may need to remove in the future. Staff also noted administrative review will be context based and that staff retains the option to refer particular cases to Council for review.
Commissioner Gan moved to recommend approval; a second was recorded and the motion carried unanimously. The commission's recommendation will be transmitted to City Council for formal consideration.
