Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Traffic Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ruidoso council adopts automated speed-enforcement ordinance amid debate over fines and community-service option
Summary
After extended public discussion and a split council vote, Ruidoso adopted an automated speed-enforcement ordinance that authorizes camera-based civil citations and sets a $100 civil fine; council removed a community-service alternative before passage.
The Village of Ruidoso on Nov. 10 adopted Ordinance 2025-07 to authorize an automated speed-enforcement program that uses vendor‑installed cameras and signage to issue civil citations for speeding.
Police Chief Steve Minner told the council the program would have one fixed camera in a school zone and up to two mobile devices that the vendor would move as requested. A vendor would perform an initial review of captured violations, the police department would verify enforceable incidents, and the vendor would mail a civil citation to the registered owner. Under the ordinance as amended, each violation carries a $100 civil fine and does not add points to a driver’s license.
Chief Minner said the village would keep $75 of each $100 citation to cover program administration and traffic‑safety initiatives, with the remainder distributed per state statute. He emphasized the program is intended to supplement, not replace, traditional traffic enforcement: “They can’t be everywhere all the time,” Minner said, arguing cameras would help address problem corridors.
Councilors and members of the public raised questions about fairness, enforcement logistics and alternatives to monetary fines. One councilor described the idea of community service as “Orwellian” and expressed concern about the manpower and oversight needed to track community‑service participants. Bill Hall, a longtime public commenter, urged a larger fine to change behavior: “$100 isn’t going to change people’s behavior,” he said.
After public comments and an extended exchange with the police department and its deputy chief, Councilor Jackson moved to approve the ordinance with edits that struck the community‑service alternative and limited penalties to a $100 civil fine. The motion passed after a tie among council members was broken by the presiding officer’s yes vote.
The ordinance requires vendor signage and an initial public-education period during which warnings will be issued before citations are mailed. The police department said mobile cameras will be deployed strategically for month‑long intervals and analytics will be available to guide placement. Officials said one fixed device is planned for a White Mountain school zone, with mobile units to target other high‑risk corridors.
Next steps: staff will finalize the vendor contract, refine policy language (including handling of government vehicles and contest procedures) and begin a public-education effort before citations are issued.
