Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Procedure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board debates whether an advertised solicitation ordinance must appear on tonight’s agenda
Summary
Board members disputed whether a solicitation ordinance that was advertised in the newspaper needed a formal agenda amendment; one member said the advertisement satisfied public notice while others said it should appear on the agenda going forward to improve transparency.
The Robinson Township board discussed whether a solicitation ordinance that had been advertised in the local paper needed an explicit agenda amendment before being considered at tonight’s meeting. Speaker 2 said the ordinance had been advertised and argued that the advertisement provided sufficient public notice; Speaker 1 said the omission from the printed agenda was “sloppy” and favored listing advertised ordinances on the agenda in the future.
Why it matters: Board procedure determines how residents learn about potential ordinances and when a court reporter or formal public hearing is required. Clear agenda practices affect transparency and the ability of residents to participate before decisions are made.
At the meeting, Speaker 2 explained the practice: “It was advertised in the Redding Eagle on 9-26 and I have a signed proof of advertisement” and said that, because the solicitation ordinance had been publicly noticed and revised after its first draft, it could legally proceed. Several other board members urged a tighter internal practice of putting advertised ordinances on the agenda so the public and board members have an explicit reference point.
The board discussed differences between ordinances that require a public hearing (for land-use or zoning changes) and the solicitation ordinance before them; Speaker 2 said a land-use ordinance amendment would require a public hearing and court reporting, whereas a solicitation ordinance does not, which informed some members’ views about whether an agenda amendment was needed.
No emergency amendment was declared. After discussion, the chair and several members agreed to make the practice clearer going forward and to ensure advertised ordinances are placed on future agendas so residents are better informed. The board did not take a new formal vote on agenda format at tonight’s meeting; members said they would ensure the solicitation ordinance is listed in future packs and that proof of advertisement would remain part of the record.
The board moved on to other agenda items, including grant and dedication matters; any further action on the solicitation ordinance is expected to appear on a future agenda.
