Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Coatesville district proposes $256.5M 2026–27 budget and a 3.5% tax increase

Coatesville Area School District Board of School Directors · May 26, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District finance staff presented a $256.5 million expenditure proposal for 2026–27 and recommended a 3.5% tax increase (millage from 44.364 to 45.917) to help close a projected gap; the district also plans a public notice May 29 and a June 9 meeting to adopt the final budget.

District finance staff outlined a proposed 2026–27 budget with expenditures of $256.5 million, a $14.5 million (5.99%) increase over the prior year, and projected revenues of $253.1 million, a $17.6 million (7.49%) increase, the presenter said.

"The proposed expenditure budget totals 256.5 million," the finance presenter said, noting increases in salaries and benefits, contracted services (charter tuition and transportation), special-education costs, and debt-service obligations.

The administration recommended using about $3.3 million of the fund balance and proposed a tax-rate recommendation based on a 3.5% increase under the Act 1 index. Under that scenario, the district’s millage would rise from 44.364 to 45.917; the presenter gave an example that a homeowner with a $200,000 assessment would pay roughly $26 more per month (about $312 per year) if the board adopts the 3.5% increase.

The presenter said the district considered higher index scenarios but worked to minimize taxpayer impact. The administration plans to publish a public notice of intent to adopt the final budget on May 29 and to bring the final budget to a special board meeting on June 9 for approval.

Superintendent Dr. Barczyk thanked administrative and finance staff for their work and noted that mandated and contract-driven costs limit the district’s flexibility to reduce expenses without affecting operations.

No final budget vote was taken on May 26; the board discussed next steps and timelines for public notice and a final vote.