Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the District Budget And Policies topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board hears $100K outlay, $663K bus proposition and budget previews; several policies advanced
Summary
The board reviewed a $100,000 capital outlay proposal for pool bleacher replacement and dock repairs, a bus replacement proposition totaling about $663,000, and preliminary O&M, IT and transportation budgets; the policy committee advanced several policy first reads and approved others.
Get email alerts on the District Budget And Policies topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Administration outlined several smaller budget and operational items alongside the capital project discussion.
Capital outlay: The district described a $100,000 capital outlay project for pool interior bleacher replacement and loading‑dock repairs. Staff said the outlay cap does not require spending the full $100,000 and estimated construction for the bleacher and dock items at roughly $80,000–$85,000, with remaining funds covering architecture and incidental fees. The outlay must be voter‑approved and the work completed by June 30 of the aid year to qualify for state aid.
Bus proposition: Transportation staff proposed purchasing one Microbird G5 and three Bluebird Vision 42‑passenger buses for roughly $663,000. Administration said the district’s current electrification study shows utility upgrades are needed before the district could adopt more electric buses, and that the current fleet plan remains centered on diesel and propane vehicles pending infrastructure and make‑ready support.
Budgets: Administration previewed proposed Operations & Maintenance (~$4 million), IT (~$1.66 million) and transportation (just under $4 million) budgets. The O&M decrease is linked to retirements and staff changes; IT rose mainly because of contractual obligations and software/service contracts; transportation decreases reflect some route shortening but staff warned driver shortages may require contracting out runs and could affect the projected savings.
Policies: The policy committee moved several items to first read (13:1–13:4, 13:8) and approved policies 13:5–13:7 on second read. The social‑media policy (13:5) was approved with changes and the committee noted training and compliance plans will follow; the board discussed but did not require labeling of AI‑assisted communications in the adopted administrative goals.
Board action: The board approved routine business items (donations noted) and personnel considerations by voice vote. Administration noted upcoming dates: a board vote on the proposed budget is scheduled for April 15, the budget hearing and meet‑the‑candidates night on May 6, and filing deadlines for capital project propositions in early April that may require a special meeting if additional materials are not ready.
No final vote on the large capital project occurred at this meeting; staff asked the board to consider authorization at the next meeting to meet filing deadlines.

