Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Innovation Zone topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Innovation zone leaders outline systems approach to accelerate improvement in 33 schools

Academic Achievement Committee · March 17, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District leaders described a planning-year approach for 33 identified Innovation Zone schools, emphasizing leadership capacity, four system 'levers' (support & accountability, talent management, instructional infrastructure, systems leadership) and a University of Virginia readiness assessment to target interventions.

District officials on March 16 outlined a systems-driven plan to boost instruction and leadership capacity in 33 schools designated for intensive support.

Dr. Latricia Gloucester, associate superintendent for the Innovation and Performance zone, told the Academic Achievement Committee the office is treating this year as a planning year to diagnose root causes and align resources: "we're looking to implement... systems of accountability and looking at strategic performance management," she said.

The district will focus on four implementation levers—support and accountability, talent management, instructional infrastructure and systems leadership—and has engaged a University of Virginia partnership to run a district readiness assessment that identifies strengths and opportunities across those levers. Gloucester said the assessment helps the district see "what's working well in these four levers. Here are some opportunities to strengthen what's already in place."

Presenters emphasized assessment literacy and coherent use of school plans (CSI plans, school performance plans, Title I plans) so principals can identify the "big rocks" that align to a single North Star for improvement. Gloucester pointed to work at William Wirt Middle School as an example of data teams using formative and summative results to define leadership and teacher action steps intended to move a two-star school toward a three-star rating on the Maryland accountability framework.

Board members asked about family and community engagement aligned to academic goals; presenters confirmed that all 33 Innovation Zone schools are also community schools and that the district is auditing how coordinators and partners contribute to academic priorities. "All of the schools are community schools," said a community schools presenter, adding that the work is built around "coherence" across district divisions.

Why it matters: The plan centralizes leadership development and cross-departmental alignment rather than relying on compliance checklists; the UVA readiness assessment and the four-lever framework are intended to steer targeted supports and to scale practices that produce measurable improvement.

Next steps: Staff said they'll continue refining readiness findings with principals, align supports to the identified levers and report back with specific progress measures during the implementation phase.