Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legal Technology topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Podcast guests: pandemic sped tech adoption but data, privacy and access concerns remain
Summary
Panelists on Talk Justice say pandemic-era tech kept courts and legal services functioning, but they warned that digital gaps, privacy and a Florida court decision blocking a parking‑ticket app highlight tensions between consumer protection and wider access.
Host Jason Teshe asked guests to weigh pandemic-era technology adoption and its likely permanence. Bob Ambrogi called 2020’s rapid digital shifts a necessary response but said that by the end of 2021 the profession was still working out which emergency practices should remain in place.
Ambrogi noted a Pew report finding courts adapted to video hearings quickly, but said those gains served represented parties better than unrepresented litigants, who may face bandwidth, language or e‑filing barriers. “If you were a pro se litigant…you might have been shut out of court processes,” Ambrogi said.
Panelists discussed LSC’s Technology Initiative Grants and said many applications and awards focus on remote intake, outreach and electronic filing systems. Ron Flagg said the technology built over the prior decade “really saved the day” during surge periods and that TIG funding is helping legal aid programs scale remote service models.
But guests raised privacy and registration concerns. Ambrogi pointed out that attending remote legislative or court hearings can now require signing in or registering in ways that create a new data trail about citizens’ civic interactions.
The episode also covered a Florida Supreme Court decision (described on the show as a 4–3 ruling) finding that an app connecting consumers to attorneys to contest parking tickets ran afoul of unauthorized‑practice rules. Zach Miola described the opinion as covering “just about every aspect of the debate” over how broadly unauthorized‑practice rules should be read and said it underscored the need for careful rulemaking rather than unilateral judicial fixes.
Panelists urged regulators and courts to pair technology adoption with evaluation and privacy safeguards so innovations expand access without creating new barriers. The host closed by thanking the guests and directing listeners to show notes for links mentioned in the discussion.
