Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Board Grievance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Weslaco ISD board upholds Level 1 and 2 grievance findings but withholds remedy 5 after closed-session review
Summary
After a closed-session review on April 27, 2026, the Weslaco ISD board voted unanimously to uphold the district's Level 1 and Level 2 findings in a Level 3 grievance filed by J. Garcia and Jay Silva, but excluded remedy number 5 pending receipt of additional documentation. Parents had requested an open hearing while administration cited FERPA and personnel concerns.
Get email alerts on the School Board Grievance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Weslaco Independent School District board of trustees on April 27, 2026 voted to uphold the district's Level 1 and Level 2 findings in a Level 3 grievance filed by J. Garcia and Jay Silva, but the board excluded remedy number 5 and said it would await further documentation before acting on that remedy.
Board President Mr. Nieto called the special meeting to order at 5:38 p.m. and, after brief procedural remarks, the trustees considered whether to move the grievance hearing into a closed session. A representative for the parents told the board the parents had requested the hearing be conducted in open session. Administration asked for a closed meeting, citing two reasons: the meeting packet included personally identifiable student information (FERPA concerns) and the requested remedy was personnel-related and could involve adverse employment action.
"The parents have requested it be conducted in open session," said the parents' representative. Administration representatives argued that student privacy and personnel considerations justified consulting privately with counsel.
The board moved into closed session to consult with counsel and consider personnel and grievance matters; the public record shows the board returned to open session at 7:02 p.m. A board member moved "to uphold one and two, except for remedy five," saying some documents used to reach the Level 1 and Level 2 decisions had not been provided to the board and that the board would withhold a decision on remedy five until it received those materials. The motion was seconded by trustee Mark de los Santos.
The board took an individual roll-call vote; each trustee present voted in favor. The president then announced the grievance matter concluded and adjourned the meeting at approximately 7:03 p.m.
The meeting record cites Texas Government Code provisions (as referenced in the hearing record) as the legal basis for conducting parts of the grievance review in closed session because of student privacy and personnel exceptions. The board also noted district policy FNG(LOCAL) as the governing local procedure for Level 3 grievances. The complainants named in the grievance were J. Garcia and Jay Silva; the specific content of the missing documentation referenced by the board was not specified during the open session.
Next steps: the board directed that staff (noted in discussion as Dr. Rivera) follow up on outstanding documentation; the board withheld final action on remedy five until that follow-up and any additional materials could be considered in accordance with applicable law and district policy.

