Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Bond Refunding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Carmel committee approves amendments and recommends bond-refunding package projected to save $8–12 million
Summary
The Finance Committee amended a refunding resolution and voted to forward a package of refunding items (including amendments to resolution CC05182601) to the full council; staff estimated net present value savings in the roughly $9M–$12.3M range and annual budget relief concentrated in fiscal years 2027–28.
The Finance, Utilities and Rules Committee on May 20 reviewed a multi-issue refunding strategy to refinance various 2016 bond series and certain 2020 stormwater bonds, with staff projecting significant net present value savings.
Zach Jackson, the city's chief financial officer and controller, told the committee the refunding opportunity could produce estimated net present value savings in the "9 to $12 million range," with much of the general fund relief concentrated in fiscal years 2027 and 2028. "This will effectively help to make that budget work by buying down some of our expenses out of the general fund to the tune of about 4 million in each of the next two years," Jackson said.
Brad Bingham of Barnes & Thornburg, bond counsel, reviewed the background of the 2016 financings (17 separate issues across multiple security structures) and why a consolidated refunding made sense. He explained the role of the special benefits tax (SBT) — a property-tax-style backup pledge — as a credit enhancement and said the transaction does not extend maturities.
City presenters and counsel walked the committee through detailed schedules showing net present value savings by revenue stream: property-tax-backed pieces, income-tax-backed bonds, TIF-backed series and stormwater bonds. Staff noted that savings estimates reflected issuance costs and were based on late-April market marks, which could shift.
Josh Chinock of Robert W. Baird, the underwriter, described recent market volatility and recommended timely action to capture the savings window; he said pricing could move and that acting promptly historically benefited issuers.
Brad Bingham proposed a targeted amendment to resolution CC05182601 (striking the last sentence of section one) related to the 2026A refunding and the double-barrel pledge of local income tax (LIT) and SBT; the committee approved the amendment. The committee then voted to send items B, E, F, G and H (the bundled refunding-related items) to the full council with a positive recommendation.
What happens next: staff will finalize offering documents, ratings calls (S&P was flagged to be engaged), and issue schedules; the full council will consider the resolutions and the administration will continue to monitor market conditions before pricing and closing.
