Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Consent Calendar topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee places a series of placeholder bills on consent calendar amid criticism of "dummy" measures

Planning and Development · March 6, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee moved dozens of items to the consent calendar (including HB 5282, HB 5284, HB 5286, HB 5287, HB 5288, HB 5289, SB 272 and SB 275). Several members criticized use of so-called 'dummy' bills—placeholder vehicles that can be amended later without public hearing—as a recurring practice.

The Planning and Development committee placed a package of bills on its consent calendar and moved several items JF to the floor, while some members sharply criticized the routine use of placeholder or "dummy" bills.

Chair listed agenda items proposed for the consent calendar, including HB 5282 (implementing recommendations for the state plan of conservation and development, LCO 2793), HB 5284 (property tax abatement for certain first-time home buyers, LCO 2779), HB 5286 (municipal tax abatement for surviving domestic partners) and others. The chair asked whether members objected to adding SB 274 (nonresident landlord registration and increased penalties) to the consent package, and the committee proceeded to start the consent calendar.

Representative Dubitsky and others criticized the broader practice of introducing placeholder bills during committee as a way to avoid public scrutiny. He said several items appeared to be "dummy bills" with little substance and argued that language later inserted after committee action would not have gone through public hearing. Representative Dubitsky and another member repeated similar objections while voting against certain measures.

The clerk called roll on the consent calendar; the chair announced votes would remain open until 3 p.m. to allow members time to register votes if they were in other meetings. The committee recessed after completing the calls and confirmed the consent calendar passed.

The consent package moves a number of technical and policy bills forward with limited floor debate expected unless members amend them later; critics in the committee warned the practice risks reducing transparency by acting on placeholders that could later receive substantive text without a public hearing.